IMMENSITY OF THE SEA
The Power You Already Have: How People Can Shape the Systems They Use
When teams move from endless email threads to integrated systems that organise everything for them, the leap is extraordinary, yet often unnoticed. Many focus on what is missing instead of seeing the power they now hold to shape how they work.
Janna Szangolies
10 Oct 2025
Image created in Midjounrey
Transformation is not only technical, it is cultural. Systems thrive when the people who use them claim their role as co-creators, not passengers. Progress depends on participation.
In every transformation project, there is a moment when the new system goes live. Dashboards fill with information. Data flows where it never flowed before. Tasks that once lived in inboxes now have a home, a sequence, and an owner. What used to take hours becomes visible, trackable, and clear.
And then someone asks, “Why doesn’t it do this one extra thing?”
It is a fair question, but beneath it sits something deeper — a mindset that has not yet caught up with the change. The real transformation is not the tool itself; it is the understanding that everyone who uses it now has a hand in shaping how it grows.
From Passive User to Active Participant
For years, small and growing teams worked entirely through email. It was where information lived, where delegation happened, and where things were lost. Accountability was buried in threads, and progress depended on who happened to be copied in.
Then one day, a shared system arrives. Conversations turn into tasks. Documents sit where they belong. Data updates automatically. For the first time, everyone can see what is happening, when, and by whom.
It is a seismic improvement, yet many experience it as a minor change because they forget what it replaces. The work has not just moved location; it has changed nature. A tool has become a shared environment, and that means each person’s behaviour matters more than ever.
The people who live in the system every day know more about it than anyone else. Their experience is not background noise; it is the knowledge that keeps the system honest and evolving.
Recognising the Shift in Power
These systems only reach their potential when people engage with them consciously. The real success of any workflow or automation is measured not by how elegant it looks on screen, but by how willingly people take responsibility for it.
When people rely entirely on others to maintain or improve a system, progress stalls. When they contribute ideas, spot opportunities, and ask thoughtful questions, the system grows stronger with every iteration.
Power, in this context, is not about control; it is about contribution — the quiet authority that comes from knowing your input matters and that no one else sees what you see every day.
Participation Is the New Productivity
Every workshop, prototype, or workflow map depends on collaboration. The most advanced platform cannot replace the knowledge of the people who use it daily.
Yet in too many workshops, participants sit silently, waiting to be shown what will be built for them. That silence has a cost. It leaves teams building from assumption instead of insight. Later, when gaps appear, it is easy to point to what is missing rather than to what was never voiced.
True productivity begins with participation. Systems only improve when the people who understand them most choose to share what they know.
Co-Building as Everyday Practice
A good system is not a finished product; it is a conversation that evolves as the team does. The shift from scattered emails to integrated workflows is not only about efficiency or visibility — it is about collaboration.
Every improvement begins with a small act of initiative: someone noticing friction and saying, “I have an idea to improve this.”
That sentence changes everything. It turns a feature request into a shared design process and replaces frustration with ownership.
When this happens consistently, systems become self-sustaining. They evolve in response to real needs rather than assumptions.
The people closest to the work hold the key to its evolution. Their expertise is the material from which progress is made.
Owning the Discomfort of Change
Taking an active role in shaping a system can feel uncertain. It requires people to question how they work and to acknowledge what could be better. There is vulnerability in admitting that a process feels awkward or inefficient, yet that honesty keeps a system relevant.
Change is rarely comfortable, but it is far easier to influence it early than to correct it later. When people embrace that discomfort, they turn critique into creation. They stop being recipients of change and start being the reason it works.
Iteration as Shared Responsibility
In the old world, the goal was to be “done.” A project launched, the box was ticked, and the system was expected to run quietly in the background. Today, stability comes from iteration. Refinement is not a sign of failure; it is a sign of life.
Modern systems invite that kind of responsiveness. A workflow can evolve with a single update. A dashboard can shift to reflect a new priority. But none of this happens unless the people using the system see iteration as their shared responsibility, not someone else’s task list.
A living system depends on a living culture of feedback.
Remembering the Scale of the Leap
It is easy to lose sight of how remarkable this all is. Moving from scattered information and manual coordination to unified visibility and automation is a leap previous generations could not imagine.
Holding onto that sense of scale matters. It reminds us that progress is not automatic; it happens because people choose to engage with it. Every improvement and refinement begins when someone takes ownership of how they work.
The wonder is not just in the technology. It is in the human capacity to keep adapting it.
The Call to Co-Build
So next time a process feels imperfect, or a feature feels absent, begin with a different question. Instead of asking, “Why doesn’t it do this?” ask, “What would make this better, and how can I help make that happen?”
That mindset is the difference between a system that merely functions and one that flourishes. When people claim their role as co-builders, they turn software into shared intelligence. They create a feedback loop between intention and improvement.
The power to shape better systems already sits with those who use them. It only needs to be claimed.
Closing Thought
Keep the sense of curiosity and pride in what you have already built. The leap from emails to integrated systems is extraordinary, but it is only the beginning. Every step forward from here belongs to those who choose to take part.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is participation essential in system change?
Because systems are only as strong as the people who use them. When people contribute insight, the system reflects reality rather than assumption.
How can individuals influence system design?
By sharing what they observe daily — the small inefficiencies and opportunities they see first. Each idea adds depth and accuracy to the system.
What role does leadership play in participation?
Leaders set the tone for engagement. When they invite and act on feedback, participation becomes part of the culture.
How does this relate to Immensity’s other articles?
It connects with The Small Leadership Shift That Multiplies Everything Downstream (leadership modelling) and System First Thinking (whole-system awareness). Together, they show how people, leaders, and systems co-create effective operations.
What is the main takeaway?
The people who use a system know it best — their participation turns tools into systems that actually work.
Be the first to know about the latest resources
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.